The commentary by Kilwardby is an important testament to the early reception of Aristotelian moral and ethical theory. In such cases, the editor opted for the variant that best makes sense in the explication of Aristotle’s text. ![]() This decision is well justified, for instance, with respect to those instances that are due to scribal error. In these final sections of the introduction, Celano lists the most common variants found in the two manuscripts used for this edition of the text and explains the rationale for choosing between the alternative variants. Chapter 6, which is preceded by the brief sections 1–3 on editorial notes (manuscripts used, methodology, orthography and sigla), marks the start of the second part of the book, the edition of Kilwardby’s commentary. The lengthier chapter 3 examines the Expositio super libros Ethicorum in connection with other works by Kilwardby and some of his contemporaries, while chapter 4 focuses on the key topics considered in the Ethica vetus and Chapter 5 provides a conclusion to this interpretative part of the study. The first part of the volume consists of five chapters, with the first two providing a characterization of the context in which this text was written (chapter 1) and the background of its author (chapter 2). The book is divided into two parts: the first consists of a lengthy study of Kilwardby’s commentary on the first three books of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics whereas the second includes the edition of Robert Kilwardby’s Expositio super libros Ethicorum. ![]() Much has been published in recent decades about these early discussions, and Anthony Celano’s study, Robert Kilwardby’s Commentary on the Ethics of Aristotle, is a very welcome addition to this scholarship on medieval ethics, as well as to the thirteenth-century Dominican Robert Kilwardby. ![]() The first Latin commentaries on the text, from the first half of the thirteenth century, centered around the concepts of the good, human happiness, and virtue, which form the core of the Aristotelian treatise. Medieval moral philosophy was never the same after the introduction in the Latin West of the translation of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in the late twelfth century.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |